Description: 文章比较了H.264和AVS两个标准在运动补偿中运动矢量预测算法的差别, 提出了一种实现H.264 中
主档次(main pmille)下的第4级别(1evel 4)和AVS中的基准档次面向高清应用时运动矢量预测复用的硬件结构。
提出了一种新颖的缓存管理更新机制.极限情况下用于运动矢量的片上缓存大小减少了75% 。用FPGA验证结果
表明资源占用情况是单独实现AVS的2.3倍,是单独同时实现两个标准的70%。能实现对1080i 30Hz高清图像实
时解码。-Article compares the H. 264 and AVS standards in the two motion compensation algorithm in the motion vector prediction difference, a realization of H. 264 in the main level (main pmille) under section 4 level (1evel 4) and AVS in the benchmark grade of application-oriented high-definition motion vector prediction reuse the hardware structure. A novel cache management update mechanism. Limit used for motion vectors on-chip cache size reduction of 75. The results show that the use of FPGA resources to verify the occupancy of a separate AVS realize 2.3 times, both individually and at the same time realize the standard 70. Can realize high-definition images to 1080i 30Hz real-time decoding. Platform: |
Size: 275456 |
Author:宋恋 |
Hits:
Description: 本文从技术角度对MPEG-2的视频标准、MPEG-4 AVC/H.264和AVS视频(GB/T 200090.2) 三个视频标准进行对比,包括技术方案、主观测试、客观测试、复杂度等四个方面。-This from a technical point of view of MPEG-2 video standard, MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 and AVS video (GB/T 200090.2) compared three video standards, including technical programs, subjective testing, objective testing, the complexity of the four aspects. Platform: |
Size: 287744 |
Author:bluefeifei |
Hits: